【李霖】《秦風·渭陽一包養網》的經學建構

作者:

requestId:68499ab156d156.26094536.

The academic structure of “Qin Feng·Wei Yang”

Author: Li Lin (Zhongshan Dali Academy of Sciences)

Source: “History of Chinese Philosophy” 2017 Issue 3

Time: Confucius was in the 16th day of the Xuanyue of Dingyou

Yi

               Jesus November 4, 2017

 

  

 

Author profile: Li Lin, associate professor at Zhongshan PhD PhD, deputy director of the Central Seminar of Classical Research, and doctoral in Beijing. Overview of Taipei Center 2: Interviewer at the Institute of Culture and Philosophy, a foreign researcher at the Institute of Tokyo East Civilization Research Institute, and an invitation from the Beijing Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences. The important research and discussion areas are Chinese history and version catalog studies. He published the article “A Brief Introduction to Zheng Xuan’s Principles of “Pen” from “Big Ya Si Qi”, “A Study on the Annotations and Commentaries of the Eight Lines of the Southern Song Dynasty”, and “The Existence and Revision of the Official Edition of Zhejiang-Edited Issues in the Southern Song Dynasty”, etc. Start courses such as “Penchant” and “Historical Records”.

 

 

1. The basis for the text of the preface to “Weiyang”

 

“Qin Feng Weiyang” in “Pen Feng” writes a noble family who bid farewell to their uncle in Weiyang, and said: “I sent my uncle to Weiyang.” Why do you like it? Car by car.

 

I sent my uncle to my heart, and I thought about it all the time. Why do you like it? Jade pendant.

 

“Mao Poetry” believes that the author of “Wei Yang” is Qin Kang Gongyu. Gong Kang was the prince of Duke Mu. His uncle, the son of Duke Wu, was sent to Qin. Under the support of Duke Mu of Qin, he was about to attack Duke Wu. The prince gave him the opportunity to win the favor, and he was different from Weiyang. The preface says:

 

“Weiyang”, Gong Kang is the mother of his mother. The mother of Mr. Kang and the daughter of Mr. Jing. Duke Wen suffered from the trouble of Li Ji, but instead of Qin Ji’s death. Duke Mu Na Wen. When Kang Gong was a big son, he gave Duke Wen to the sun in Wei. I missed my mother’s disregard. I saw my uncle, just like my mother. And his ascension,And make this poem.

 

  

 

“Weiyang”

 

Since the Song Dynasty, the poem has been questioned by the scholars. There are few differences in the elements of a nephew and uncle in “Weiyang”. Zhu Zi’s “Praise of the Preface” made a powerful comment on the preface of “Mao Poetry”, and also said that “only “Huang Bird” and “Wei Yang” are obvious in “Qin Feng”, and other poems are not tested”, and put the reliable nature of the preface of “Wei Yang” with “Huang Bird”. Preface to “Huang Bird” by Duke Mu of Qin, the saying of Sanliang’s death, was originally seen in the poem, and can also be printed with “Zuo Zhuan”. Does the preface to “Weiyang” also have such powerless evidence?

 

The preface of “Weiyang” can be proved by guessing the existing history. First, Mr. Kang’s mother was Chong’er’s mother and sister, and Qin Kang and Xu Wen were nephews and uncles. Second, “Mu Duke Na Wen Duke”, “Na means “Inside the river”. Chong’er was able to return to the country and become the king, and could not leave Qin Mu’s support. “Zuo Ji” says “Qin Bona” Third, Kang Gongshi was the crown prince. The rest are still not clear and historical evidence.

 

  

 

Map of Qin Dynasty during the age period (“Collection of Chinese Historical Maps”)

 

Chong’er returned to the river and saw the pre-Qin literature. Among them, the original and realistic records of “Zuo Ji” in the 24th year of Duke Xi (636BC) and “Mandarin·Christian IV” are the most worthy of attention. “Zuo Ji” says:

 

In the 24th year, in the spring, the first month of the king, Qin Boben named him. If you don’t write, you won’t go to the Female College Students’ Care Club. When he arrived at the river, the son insulted the imperial son with a jade, saying, “I am responsible for traveling to the king to patrol the whole country. I have committed many crimes. Is it true that I know it, but I am betrayed the king? Please die from this.” The imperial son said, “What I do not have the heart to my uncle is like white water.” He threw his jade in the river. The Jin River surrounds Linghu, enters the mulberry spring, and takes the mortar to decline. In mid-spring, the teacher in Xuliu was in charge of the throne. The Qin Bo ordered the son to take Rushi Master. The teacher retreated and the enemy was attacked. Xin Chou, Hu Yan and Qin and the great servants of Qin and Qi joined forces in Xun. In Renyin, the son ordered the son to enter the to take care of the conditions. Bingwu, entered Quwo. Dingwei, the court was at the Wu Palace. In Wushen, the killing of the Lord of the Sorghum was made. No, noReport to the 官网.

 

Duke Mu, Qin and the Han Dynasty, took the Huang River as the boundary, and Chong’er and his “uncle” son fled (Hu Yan) to the river bank. According to the Linghu, Sangquan and Jihu, which occupied the river after crossing the Chong’er River, we recommend that the ferry crossing beside the river. It is 30 kilometers away from the Wei River (Weixian) and cannot be called “Weiyang”. “The Qin Bo sent the son to take the emperor as the teacher”, “Hu Yan and the Qin and Qin dynasties to the gang” means that Chong Er entered the river, and Qin Mu, Qin Dafu, Qin Wang, and Qin troops were sent along the way. [1] The number of “Son’s Hand” in this is found in “Left-Book” and “Mandarin”, and is not related to the prince’s hand.

 

Therefore, in articles such as “Zuo Ji”, “He”, and “Langlang Bao” appear in articles such as “Xiao Qi”, which seem to be related to the preface of “Wei Yang”, it is impossible to prove that the prince of Qin sent his uncle to Wei Yang. Even if Qin Ji could pass away at that time, there was no shortage of pre-Qin literary support. [2]

 

2. The preface of “Weiyang” can be established

 

The preface of “Weiyang” lacks internal support. Even so, it is impossible to be so true. To take a step back, if the Qin prince saw him off and made a difference in Weiyang, he could meet the “historical” situation of Chong’er’s return and fit into the “Weiyang” as a “book”, then the preface of “Weiyang” can still be explained by itself.

 

Kang Gong sent a military official to the public, of course, “consisting with the Internet”, the problem is that Gong Mu was in charge of his conquest, and whether the prince’s farewell was worthy of book confirmation. At that time, the capital of Qin Yong, Yong was about 20 kilometers north of the Wei River. If the prince was sent to Weiyang, he would have left the capital, which seemed unfair. “Zuo Ji” In the second year of Duke Yan, when he was aware of Duke Yu, he discussed the prince’s mission, and also said “The king should act and guard”. The text says:

 

The prince worships the tomb and the country’s prosperity, so he sees the king’s food every day, so he is called a tomb. You act and guard, and there is a guardian. It is called “王子” and “正” is called “正” and “正” which is the ancient system.

 

When the king of the country went out, the prince should defend the country; however, Rick also said, “There is a preceptor”, which means that in “theory”, if someone defends the country, the prince can follow the king of the country as a military component. Although we have not seen any relevant examples in history, the space provided by “Zuoshi” as a book cannot be eliminated by Kang Gong’s ability to see off Chong’er.

 

If Gong Kang saw him off for Chong’er and finally stopped in Weiyang, then Weiyang should have a certain identity on the ground. “Mao Feng Zhengyi” says: “Yong is in Weinan, and the north of the water is called Yang, and it is in Qindong. You must cross the Wei Dynasty when you go.” Regardless of the “Zhengyi” says that Yong is in Weinan.The mistake was that after sending Wengong to cross the Wei River from Yong, it was precisely the sign of Weiyang as the land turret. But Yong Really is in Weibei. Whether Weiyang c


留言

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *